Timeline for Are $\infty$-topoi determined by their localic points ?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2013 at 17:11 | answer | added | Marc Hoyois | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 25, 2013 at 10:23 | comment | added | Simon Henry | My motivation for this question is related to the relation between the geometric objects considered in topos theory/stacks theory and those considered in Non commutative geometry. In the first case (with possibly the exception of infinity topos depending of the answer to this question) every object is completely characterize by its morphism from 'commutative' object. but this is not true in non commutative geometry, for example there exist C^* alegebra of type one, which are not characterize by the stacks of their irreducible representation over all locale. (I'm working in Paris). | |
| Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16 | comment | added | Simon Henry | Thank you for your paper, even if i already knew that this was true for classical topos it give really interesting precision on the nature of this embeddings. | |
| Jan 25, 2013 at 5:26 | history | edited | Mike Shulman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed grammar in title again
|
| Jan 24, 2013 at 19:25 | comment | added | David Carchedi | Out of where are you based Simon? | |
| Jan 24, 2013 at 19:24 | history | edited | David Carchedi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed grammar in title
|
| Jan 24, 2013 at 19:22 | comment | added | David Carchedi | I don't know the answer on the top of my head. I do know however that this result is true for $1$-topoi; one can even characterize the stacks that they represent over the site of locales as "etale complete localic stacks" (See: arxiv.org/abs/1011.6070). | |
| Jan 22, 2013 at 11:53 | history | asked | Simon Henry | CC BY-SA 3.0 |