Timeline for What are the general techniques for proving a variety is not toric?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2014 at 15:12 | answer | added | Puzzled | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 19, 2013 at 0:55 | comment | added | minimax | @Piotr: Thanks, it has been changed! | |
| Jan 19, 2013 at 0:54 | history | edited | minimax | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 17, 2013 at 17:19 | answer | added | Daniel Pomerleano | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 17, 2013 at 17:09 | answer | added | Daniel Loughran | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 17, 2013 at 7:11 | comment | added | Piotr Achinger | Dear minimax, the inequality in the question should read $s>3$, not $s\geq 3$ (unless the 3 points are collinear). The blow-up of $\mathbb{P}^2$ at three non-collinear points is toric. | |
| Jan 17, 2013 at 7:05 | comment | added | minimax | @Piotr: Changed! | |
| Jan 17, 2013 at 7:05 | history | edited | minimax | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jan 17, 2013 at 6:58 | comment | added | Piotr Achinger | Related to my comment above: mathoverflow.net/questions/93224/… | |
| Jan 17, 2013 at 6:57 | comment | added | Piotr Achinger | Dear minimax, I think the title question is much more interesting than the particular case you want! I suggest adding "what are the general techniques for proving that a given variety is not toric"? | |
| Jan 17, 2013 at 6:49 | answer | added | Piotr Achinger | timeline score: 9 | |
| Jan 17, 2013 at 6:31 | history | asked | minimax | CC BY-SA 3.0 |