Timeline for Primitive Cohomology Useful?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2013 at 22:32 | comment | added | LMN | I moved my follow up question (the parts on Computing and Functoriality) here to have everything in one place. | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 22:28 | history | edited | LMN | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1049 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2013 at 18:09 | comment | added | anon | The question should be, why do we need to decompose the cohomology into its primitive parts? You answered your own question: in order to be able to state the Hodge index theorem, or, more generally, Grothendieck's standard conjectures. | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 16:19 | answer | added | Mikhail Bondarko | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 13:38 | answer | added | Donu Arapura | timeline score: 19 | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 7:05 | history | edited | LMN | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 96 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jan 12, 2013 at 6:45 | answer | added | Dan Petersen | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jan 12, 2013 at 6:04 | history | edited | LMN | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 289 characters in body; added 52 characters in body
|
| Jan 12, 2013 at 5:21 | history | asked | LMN | CC BY-SA 3.0 |