Timeline for Uniqueness of values in recurrence relations
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2013 at 21:51 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | No worries at all, and I wasn't implying you were doing this to rack up points; I just didn't know if you were aware. It's fine to fill up more than one comment box if you need to. And yes, it is impossible to edit comments, which is indeed annoying (but that will change once we make the move to MO 2.0); one is probably better off writing a comment in a text editor and then pasting it in, although I admit I never bother doing this myself. Finally, I should have said before: welcome to MO! :-) | |
| Jan 10, 2013 at 19:49 | comment | added | Jim White | Another problem is that you don't seem to be able to edit comments | |
| Jan 10, 2013 at 17:20 | comment | added | Jim White | My apologies! I wasn't trying to rack up points but was concerned about the apparent size limit on comments. Eg: my discussion of the polynomials in the answer immediately above, would surely not fit? | |
| Jan 10, 2013 at 14:04 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Dr. Memory, I believe you have enough "reputation" (points) now to be leaving comments under answers, rather than creating more "answers" just to make comments. | |
| Jan 10, 2013 at 10:43 | history | answered | Jim White | CC BY-SA 3.0 |