Timeline for On the de Rham cohomology of 1-forms in cotangent bundle.
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2013 at 2:00 | history | edited | Chris Gerig | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| S Jan 11, 2013 at 17:46 | vote | accept | Mathboy | ||
| Jan 11, 2013 at 17:35 | vote | accept | Mathboy | ||
| S Jan 11, 2013 at 17:46 | |||||
| Jan 11, 2013 at 11:05 | vote | accept | Mathboy | ||
| Jan 11, 2013 at 17:35 | |||||
| Jan 11, 2013 at 1:02 | answer | added | Mike Usher | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 10, 2013 at 18:36 | comment | added | Spiro Karigiannis | I edited the question, so the above remarks are no longer relevant. | |
| Jan 10, 2013 at 18:36 | history | edited | Spiro Karigiannis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited grammar, changed "cohomology group" to "cohomology class"
|
| Jan 10, 2013 at 12:21 | answer | added | Peter Michor | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 10, 2013 at 9:36 | comment | added | Mathboy | Dear Serge, yes, I mean the de Rham cohomology class of f. | |
| Jan 10, 2013 at 9:31 | comment | added | Serge Lvovski | Did you mean de Rham cohomology clacc of $f$? | |
| Jan 10, 2013 at 8:44 | history | edited | Mathboy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I Edited the question according to the comments of Serge and Tagging. Thanks them!
|
| Jan 10, 2013 at 8:39 | comment | added | Mathboy | Yes, actually it should be called the de Rham cohomology. Thanks! | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 17:49 | comment | added | Tim Perutz | Should "Hodge homology group" read "de Rham cohomology class"? | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 15:43 | history | edited | Mathboy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 39 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jan 9, 2013 at 15:37 | comment | added | Mathboy | Tanks serge. I think I made a mistake here. I will edit my question. | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 14:24 | comment | added | Serge Lvovski | The "well known result" you refer to cannot be true if understood literally: for example, if $Y\subset X$ is a smooth submanifold, then the set of all covectors at points $y\in Y$ that annihilate the tangent subspace $T_yY\subset T_yX$, is a Lagrangian submanifold as well. | |
| Jan 9, 2013 at 13:50 | history | edited | Mathboy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
| Jan 9, 2013 at 13:44 | history | asked | Mathboy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |