Timeline for Classify cross-sections of the adjoint quotient for a semisimple algebraic group?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2022 at 5:33 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed arxiv front-end link, gave title; fixed broken numdam link and also gave title
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Dec 30, 2012 at 13:15 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @ayanta: I've tried to clarify (1), which is less important than (2); but a different approach to (1) might shed light on where Steinberg's construction of a section fits into the more complicated prime characteristic picture. | |
| Dec 30, 2012 at 13:09 | history | edited | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 73 characters in body
|
| Dec 29, 2012 at 23:07 | comment | added | user30180 | The Friedman-Morgan proof looks completely algebraic (i.e., it isn't clear what "analytic flavor" you're referring to). In a few places they write $\mathbf{C}$, but only in places where it could just as well be any algebraically closed field of char. 0. Please clarify why the proof by Friedman and Morgan doesn't satisfy your requirements. | |
| Dec 29, 2012 at 19:52 | history | edited | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Dec 29, 2012 at 19:21 | history | asked | Jim Humphreys | CC BY-SA 3.0 |