Timeline for Independent evidence for the classification of topological 4-manifolds?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2021 at 15:50 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | @KarlLuttinger This answer is quoted in this article on Quanta magazine. | |
| Sep 16, 2021 at 1:59 | comment | added | David Roberts♦ | And, thankfully, the lectures gave rise to more lectures, and a big team effort, resulting in the book with a fully worked-out proof. | |
| Sep 30, 2015 at 7:27 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Sep 30, 2015 at 8:17 | |||||
| Sep 29, 2015 at 19:18 | review | Late answers | |||
| Sep 30, 2015 at 7:25 | |||||
| Feb 18, 2013 at 14:25 | comment | added | Brendan Guilfoyle | A discussion wiki for questions (and hopefully answers) on the proof is now running at mpim-bonn.mpg.de/node/4494. | |
| Feb 6, 2013 at 13:02 | comment | added | Brendan Guilfoyle | For those interested in coming to their own conclusions, videos of Freedman's lectures are available at mpim-bonn.mpg.de/node/4436 . The lectures are taking place twice a week (Tues and Thurs) and are uploaded the following day. | |
| Dec 24, 2012 at 16:43 | comment | added | Andrew Lobb | It would be good if the Bonn semester produces such a clear exposition. One reason that such an exposition has not been written might be that Freedman's Theorem somehow killed the major question. This wasn't the case with Donaldson's work of the same time, which showed that there were interesting questions still to be asked in the smooth category. I think it's recognized that this lack of understanding of Freedman's work is regrettable: this is one of the motivational reasons behind having this semester. I think people should hold fire on this thread until after the Bonn semester is done. | |
| Dec 24, 2012 at 13:47 | history | answered | Karl Luttinger | CC BY-SA 3.0 |