Skip to main content

Timeline for Factoriality of cones

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 17, 2012 at 15:09 vote accept gio
Dec 17, 2012 at 15:00 comment added Francesco Polizzi Of course you can consider cones with positive dimensional vertex, but I do not know if there is an analog of Lipman's results for them. So I restricted myself to the case where the vertex is a point.
Dec 17, 2012 at 14:56 comment added Francesco Polizzi If $X$ is a Grassmannian, then $X$ is smooth. It is not difficult to see that the image of $X$ under the Plucker embedding is projectively normal and that $\textrm{Pic}(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, see mathoverflow.net/questions/7604/…. So any divisor on $X$ is an integer multiple of the hyperplane section, in other words for Grassmannians (1) is satisfied.
Dec 17, 2012 at 14:44 comment added gio My real question is when your condition (1c) is also satisfied. But why do you request that the vertex of the cone is a point? Moreover, can I have some elucidation/reference on the fact that (1c) implies (1) ?
Dec 17, 2012 at 14:34 history edited Francesco Polizzi CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 8 characters in body
Dec 17, 2012 at 14:26 history edited Francesco Polizzi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 512 characters in body; deleted 163 characters in body; deleted 3 characters in body
Dec 17, 2012 at 14:17 history answered Francesco Polizzi CC BY-SA 3.0