Timeline for Factoriality of cones
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 17, 2012 at 15:09 | vote | accept | gio | ||
Dec 17, 2012 at 15:00 | comment | added | Francesco Polizzi | Of course you can consider cones with positive dimensional vertex, but I do not know if there is an analog of Lipman's results for them. So I restricted myself to the case where the vertex is a point. | |
Dec 17, 2012 at 14:56 | comment | added | Francesco Polizzi | If $X$ is a Grassmannian, then $X$ is smooth. It is not difficult to see that the image of $X$ under the Plucker embedding is projectively normal and that $\textrm{Pic}(X)=\mathbb{Z}$, see mathoverflow.net/questions/7604/…. So any divisor on $X$ is an integer multiple of the hyperplane section, in other words for Grassmannians (1) is satisfied. | |
Dec 17, 2012 at 14:44 | comment | added | gio | My real question is when your condition (1c) is also satisfied. But why do you request that the vertex of the cone is a point? Moreover, can I have some elucidation/reference on the fact that (1c) implies (1) ? | |
Dec 17, 2012 at 14:34 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
Dec 17, 2012 at 14:26 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 512 characters in body; deleted 163 characters in body; deleted 3 characters in body
|
Dec 17, 2012 at 14:17 | history | answered | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |