Timeline for Space of sections of a fibre bundle with non-compact base space
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23 at 23:43 | history | edited | David Roberts♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
links
|
| Feb 10, 2013 at 18:27 | answer | added | Renato G. Bettiol | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Jan 2, 2013 at 11:01 | vote | accept | Tobias Diez | ||
| S Jan 2, 2013 at 11:01 | vote | accept | Tobias Diez | ||
| S Jan 2, 2013 at 11:01 | |||||
| Jan 2, 2013 at 10:13 | vote | accept | Tobias Diez | ||
| S Jan 2, 2013 at 11:01 | |||||
| Dec 17, 2012 at 8:04 | answer | added | Andrew Stacey | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 17, 2012 at 8:03 | answer | added | Peter Michor | timeline score: 14 | |
| Dec 17, 2012 at 1:32 | comment | added | Paul | @PR $G$ is acting on itself by conjugation, not translation in $P\times_G G$. So eg $P\times_G G$ always has sections, and $P$ never does if $P$ is non-trivial. | |
| Dec 16, 2012 at 22:47 | comment | added | Samuele | Hmm maybe the fact is (I didn't read the articles, so I'm just guessing) that for a non compact base manifold, the Fréchet structures you obtain are not tamely equivalent... | |
| Dec 16, 2012 at 21:24 | comment | added | Paul Reynolds | I thought the gauge group was the space of sections of $M \times G$. $P \times_G G$ is naturally isomorphic to $P$ unless I've misunderstood. | |
| Dec 16, 2012 at 20:50 | history | asked | Tobias Diez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |