Timeline for Graded local rings versus local rings
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2010 at 15:29 | vote | accept | Steven Sam | ||
| Oct 20, 2009 at 23:26 | vote | accept | Steven Sam | ||
| Sep 6, 2010 at 15:29 | |||||
| Oct 20, 2009 at 23:26 | comment | added | Steven Sam | I think the graded Nakayama's lemma is much easier to prove. If the ring is positively graded, we can just use induction: say mM = M where m is the maximal ideal. Then M_0 = 0 since nothing maps to it, and hence M_1 = 0, etc. So maybe I will just reask if I run into a specific statement I am unsure about. Thanks! | |
| Oct 20, 2009 at 1:58 | history | edited | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added stuff on more general gradings
|
| Oct 20, 2009 at 1:42 | history | edited | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
made it into more of a proper answer
|
| Oct 19, 2009 at 5:25 | history | answered | Greg Stevenson | CC BY-SA 2.5 |