Timeline for Groups that do not exist
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 5, 2017 at 3:47 | answer | added | Richard Lyons | timeline score: 18 | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Dec 12, 2012 at 17:29 | vote | accept | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | ||
Dec 8, 2012 at 20:49 | answer | added | DavidLHarden | timeline score: 40 | |
Dec 8, 2012 at 11:15 | answer | added | Geoff Robinson | timeline score: 31 | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 22:53 | comment | added | Will Jagy | Note that Matthew Emerton is an Illuminatus. That's got to be correct, alumni, alumnus... | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 21:56 | comment | added | 36min | @Arturo, thanks for the correction, but I cannot edit the comment :(. | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 21:23 | comment | added | Will Jagy | Mariano, I won't tell. | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 21:18 | answer | added | Nick Gill | timeline score: 31 | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 21:01 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | We have managed to convince you that we do not exist Will, good. ... Hmm. Oops. | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 20:48 | comment | added | Will Jagy | The Illuminati. | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 20:45 | comment | added | Arturo Magidin | @36min: The $p^aq^b$ theorem is due to Burnside, not Frobenius... | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 20:33 | comment | added | 36min | Great question. I wanted to ask something related, namely, what do we learn from those arguments that shows finite simple groups of a certain order does not exist? Those thing appear in abstract algebra course bothers beginners, and I'm not sure how useful they are for the training of a mathematician. (e.g. there cannot be a simple group of order 112, and it does not easily follow from Sylow theorems, but what's the point? (It does follow from the $p^aq^b$ theorem of Frobenius though.)) | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 19:34 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | I really prefer for answerers to be rewarded for their effort :-) | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 19:31 | comment | added | YCor | This should be cw. | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 19:11 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | A natural follow-up question, of course, is if, say, the character table of that group which did not exist is the character group of something else. | |
Dec 7, 2012 at 19:08 | history | asked | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | CC BY-SA 3.0 |