Timeline for What are the most attractive Turing undecidable problems in mathematics?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 26, 2020 at 20:39 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | @CiroSantilli郝海东冠状病六四事件法轮功 See here and here respectively. | |
Dec 26, 2020 at 20:26 | comment | added | Ciro Santilli OurBigBook.com | @NoahSchweber that's OK, thanks. What's 𝑝[𝑡] and 𝔽𝑝((𝑡))? :-) | |
Dec 26, 2020 at 20:08 | history | edited | Noah Schweber | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body
|
Dec 26, 2020 at 20:08 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | @CiroSantilli郝海东冠状病六四事件法轮功 "This question is very basic however, and possibly should not have been asked here on this site" I strongly disagree. I think this question is fine for MO. Separately, I've edited the answer - I hesitate to undo your edit unilaterally, but I think it's more gracefully done by not adding a parenthetical. | |
Dec 26, 2020 at 16:30 | comment | added | Ciro Santilli OurBigBook.com | @YemonChoi feel free to revert, you our Qiaochu if you feel its better. This question is very basic however, and possibly should not have been asked here on this site, but it is too late now. It will also be Googled by many compsci undergrads who might now know what those sets are. | |
Dec 26, 2020 at 16:12 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | @CiroSantilli郝海东冠状病六四事件法轮功 It would be more courteous to ask what ${\mathbb Q}_p$ is before editing Qiaochu's answer. MathOverflow is intended for professional mathematicians and people write their answers with that audience is mind; and we do not quite follow the usual StackExchange norms when it comes to rewriting other people's content | |
Dec 26, 2020 at 13:15 | comment | added | Ciro Santilli OurBigBook.com | What's $\mathbb{F}_p[t]$ and $\mathbb{F}_p((t))$? :-) | |
Dec 26, 2020 at 13:13 | history | edited | Ciro Santilli OurBigBook.com | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
explain what Q_p is for newbies like me
|
Feb 18, 2020 at 14:14 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
http -> https (the question has been bumped anyway)
|
Jan 12, 2010 at 20:13 | comment | added | Sam Derbyshire | I find these results really interesting; in a way it shows why analysis is so successful. | |
Jan 12, 2010 at 17:27 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | Thanks very much, Qiaochu, for moving your question over here. I appreciate it, and I think we'll get a good list. | |
Jan 12, 2010 at 17:09 | history | edited | Qiaochu Yuan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 20 characters in body
|
Jan 12, 2010 at 17:04 | history | answered | Qiaochu Yuan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |