Timeline for Lattice in a certain Lie group
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2014 at 20:57 | comment | added | Misha | @NickS: I think you should ask a separate question. I do not know an off hand answer and will not be able to think about this for a week. | |
| Feb 15, 2014 at 20:48 | comment | added | Nick S | If $G$ is locally compact and abelian, and $D$ is a lattice in $G$, do you know if one can prove the existence of a measurable FD without the second countability assumption?.. Should I ask this as a question, or is it OK if I ask here? | |
| Dec 5, 2012 at 20:47 | comment | added | Misha | @Guntram: Because the measure of a fundamental domain is the same as the measure of the quotient $\Gamma\backslash G$. | |
| Dec 5, 2012 at 18:21 | comment | added | Guntram | It's not clear why two fundamental domains have the same measure. | |
| Dec 5, 2012 at 16:21 | vote | accept | Edward Cooper | ||
| Dec 5, 2012 at 13:50 | history | edited | Misha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 185 characters in body
|
| Dec 5, 2012 at 9:37 | comment | added | Marc Palm | A reference is also in Deitmar-Echterhoff "Principles of Harmonic Analysis" Chapter 9 somewhere, not sure though if they refer only to uniform lattices. Nice proof +1. | |
| Dec 5, 2012 at 5:16 | history | answered | Misha | CC BY-SA 3.0 |