Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 3, 2012 at 3:08 history edited Greg Friedman CC BY-SA 3.0
corrected spelling of Lefschetz and fixed some grammar
Dec 1, 2012 at 15:40 answer added Danny Ruberman timeline score: 4
Dec 1, 2012 at 14:56 answer added Mark Grant timeline score: 0
Dec 1, 2012 at 13:41 comment added Donu Arapura The form of Poincaré duality with twisted or local coefficients that I am familiar with would say that $$H^i(X,\rho)\cong H_c^{n-k}(X,\rho^\vee)^*$$ if we disregard torsion. Here $X$ is an orientable $n$-manifold, and $\rho^\vee$ is the dual or contragredient representation. Taking $X= M-\partial M$ should give the correct form of the statement you want.An overly complicated reference would be Iversen's Cohomology of Sheaves. Look up the more general Verdier dually and specialize to the above case. Alternatively, you can try to modify your favorite existing proof.
Dec 1, 2012 at 6:34 history asked Lin Jianfeng CC BY-SA 3.0