Skip to main content
30 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Apr 30, 2018 at 20:18 history suggested Rodrigo de Azevedo CC BY-SA 3.0
Minor improvements
Apr 30, 2018 at 12:56 review Suggested edits
S Apr 30, 2018 at 20:18
Sep 3, 2017 at 14:51 history protected Lucia
Jul 3, 2017 at 15:16 review Close votes
Jul 3, 2017 at 18:40
S Jul 3, 2017 at 11:59 history suggested CommunityBot CC BY-SA 3.0
I used some $
Jul 3, 2017 at 11:57 review Suggested edits
S Jul 3, 2017 at 11:59
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
S Apr 18, 2014 at 6:42 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Apr 18, 2014 at 6:42 history notice removed CommunityBot
Apr 11, 2014 at 22:18 answer added Will Sawin timeline score: 15
Apr 10, 2014 at 9:57 comment added domotorp This has been asked before, now I cannot find the other question but see researchgate.net/publication/…
Apr 10, 2014 at 5:37 comment added Włodzimierz Holsztyński Phrase "Please explain your answer" sounds... I don't know. Is it necessary?
S Apr 10, 2014 at 5:13 history bounty started Quixotic
S Apr 10, 2014 at 5:13 history notice added Quixotic Authoritative reference needed
Dec 25, 2013 at 1:36 comment added Brendan McKay It isn't clearly stated whether we have to plan all the races in advance or we can plan each race after knowing the results of the previous races. The answer could change.
Dec 25, 2013 at 1:29 comment added Eric Naslund I believe the Google interview question was $m=3$ rather than $m=5$.
Dec 25, 2013 at 0:25 review Close votes
Dec 25, 2013 at 10:33
Dec 24, 2013 at 23:02 comment added Dylan Pizzo I just wanted to say that this is the same as Generalization of a horse-racing puzzle.
Dec 3, 2012 at 17:12 history edited Debanjan Chanda CC BY-SA 3.0
added 8 characters in body
Dec 3, 2012 at 0:42 comment added Gerhard Paseman It is clear that O(nlogn) is an upper bound on what is necessary, simply by using a race as a comparison (and forgetting about 3 of the horses) and doing something like mergesort to get a complete ranking. For a complete ranking with races, information theory should yield the same order as a lower bound. For ranking a small fraction m of the n horses, it may be possible to do it in O(nlogm), but I would expect the constants for small m to outweigh logm, so practical methods would look like O(nm) in those cases. Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2012.12.02
Dec 3, 2012 at 0:19 comment added Ralph Furman Indeed, for k=2 you are looking at $m$ order statistics, which is linear in $n$.
Dec 2, 2012 at 23:37 comment added Zack Wolske @David: This is even weaker than partial sorting, since we don't need to know the exact rank of elements $1$ to $m$, just the set of elements in those positions.
Dec 2, 2012 at 21:56 history edited Debanjan Chanda CC BY-SA 3.0
added 14 characters in body
Dec 1, 2012 at 2:38 history reopened David E Speyer
algori
Todd Trimble
Gjergji Zaimi
Brendan McKay
Dec 1, 2012 at 0:32 comment added David E Speyer If $k=2$, this is a well studied but not solved problem en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_sorting . I have to assume that someone knows something about larger $k$.
Nov 30, 2012 at 20:43 comment added David E Speyer This seems like a nontrivial algorithms question to me. It may be a standard result for the right people, but I don't think it is obvious and I would be interested in learning the answer. Voting to reopen.
Nov 30, 2012 at 16:44 comment added Debanjan Chanda @Misha: I have already posted the MSE link.
Nov 30, 2012 at 16:33 comment added Misha Try math.stackexchange instead f MO.
Nov 30, 2012 at 16:33 history closed Benjamin Steinberg
Misha
Andrew Stacey
Felipe Voloch
Andy Putman
off topic
Nov 30, 2012 at 16:17 history asked Debanjan Chanda CC BY-SA 3.0