Timeline for What are some Applications of Teichmüller Theory?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2012 at 16:22 | comment | added | Robert Kucharczyk | In fact the "naive" fundamental group of $\mathscr{M}_g(\mathbb{C})$ is trivial. | |
| Nov 28, 2012 at 16:19 | history | edited | Robert Kucharczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body; added 2 characters in body
|
| Nov 28, 2012 at 16:18 | comment | added | Robert Kucharczyk | @ Qiaochu: yes. | |
| Nov 28, 2012 at 9:02 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | I've been told that $\mathcal{M}_g^{an}$ is a "more correct" notation than $\mathcal{M}_g(\mathbf{C})$, since the latter is apparently just a set. | |
| Nov 28, 2012 at 1:12 | comment | added | ThiKu | @Qiaochu: I guess you meant $g>1$? | |
| Nov 27, 2012 at 18:31 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | In the last claim doesn't "fundamental group" need to be replaced by "orbifold fundamental group" (at least for $g = 1$)? | |
| Nov 27, 2012 at 17:47 | history | answered | Robert Kucharczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |