Timeline for When does a homeomorphism split into essentially minimal homeomorphisms?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2012 at 11:58 | vote | accept | Gabor Szabo | ||
| Nov 26, 2012 at 19:58 | answer | added | Ramiro de la Vega | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 26, 2012 at 13:15 | history | edited | Tom Goodwillie | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 13 characters in body
|
| Nov 26, 2012 at 12:19 | comment | added | Gabor Szabo | Yes, that is exactly what I mean. Thank you | |
| Nov 26, 2012 at 0:50 | answer | added | Tom Goodwillie | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 26, 2012 at 0:50 | comment | added | Joel David Hamkins | In the second paragraph, when you define the minimal $\varphi$-invariant sets, you say that they should be "smallest", but I think you mean merely that they should be minimal here. Right? (Smallest = contained in all other instances; minimal = no strictly smaller instance) | |
| Nov 25, 2012 at 23:21 | history | asked | Gabor Szabo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |