Timeline for Applications of the class number formula, etc
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2023 at 2:54 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | In light of the paucity of answers, perhaps the "big-list" tag should be replaced by "empty-list"? | |
| Nov 16, 2023 at 13:59 | history | edited | John Doyle | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected spelling
|
| Nov 16, 2023 at 7:15 | history | edited | The Amplitwist | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed broken links to Wikipedia and terrytao.wordpress.com
|
| Nov 24, 2012 at 19:33 | comment | added | Gil Kalai | In the same spirit of Scott's comment I suggest to give a link to the class number formula itself and to introduce it in a few sentences in the body of the question. | |
| Nov 24, 2012 at 6:57 | comment | added | Jonah Sinick | Thanks for your suggestions. I like them. I'll implement them when I have a chance (though it may take me some time to do so, as there's a lot of expository material to write up). | |
| Nov 24, 2012 at 6:27 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Perhaps it would be better if each entry in the list came with some more substantial exposition than just a link. You might do this by putting them in separate answers, and writing a short summary of what you're linking. This way, your question becomes a place to actually read about the class number formula, instead of just a list of links. Secondly, the lack of an explanation of the class number formula or a link to say a Wikipedia page suggests you only intend the list for people who already know the formula well, and I think the question would be more attractive if you changed that. | |
| Nov 23, 2012 at 22:36 | history | edited | Jonah Sinick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 126 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2012 at 20:32 | history | asked | Jonah Sinick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |