Timeline for How does descent theory imply a sheaf is a scheme?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 13, 2017 at 6:31 | history | suggested | Topological |
Added schemes tag
|
|
| Jun 13, 2017 at 5:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 13, 2017 at 6:31 | |||||
| Nov 24, 2012 at 17:09 | history | edited | Dmitri Pavlov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2012 at 14:50 | vote | accept | HNuer | ||
| Nov 21, 2012 at 8:00 | answer | added | Angelo | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 21, 2012 at 5:26 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | You may want to look again in the last chapter of Vistoli's notes. He describes a few situations where descent is effective on schemes, and an example where it is not. Usually, the examples in the literature fall into one of the good situations, but unfortunately for readers, authors often don't bother to say precisely why. | |
| Nov 21, 2012 at 5:16 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | Minor note for HNuer and Chris Gerig: If by some chance it is difficult for you to type "é" using your keyboard, you could look up "etale topology" on Wikipedia (or your favorite search engine), and copy-paste from there. | |
| Nov 20, 2012 at 22:58 | history | edited | Chris Gerig | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Nov 20, 2012 at 22:42 | history | edited | Dan Petersen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| Nov 20, 2012 at 22:38 | history | asked | HNuer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |