Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 27, 2015 at 19:35 answer added Andy Putman timeline score: 8
Oct 6, 2013 at 13:17 comment added András Szűcs Pontryagin's mistake was, that he thought that the Arf invariant was a homomorphism instead of a quadratic function (that is $q(x+y) \ne q(x) + q(y)$, but $q(x+y) = q(x) + q(y) + xy).$
Oct 6, 2013 at 13:03 comment added András Szűcs The too much time Pontryagin spent on developing foundation could be related to the fact that the first published version of the computation of the second stable homotopy group contained a mistake and that led to an incorrect result for it. That was corrected more than ten years later.
Oct 6, 2013 at 12:53 comment added András Szűcs Naturally Pontryagin's book does not contain the computation of the third stable homotopy group of spheres, which is Rokhlin's result, but it does the computation of the first two groups.
Jul 16, 2013 at 21:41 answer added András Szűcs timeline score: 4
Nov 19, 2012 at 10:12 comment added Liviu Nicolaescu I still believe that Pontryagin's book is by far the best presentation of the subject. Unlike more modern books, Pontryagin makes a systematic effort to describe the key ideas unobscured by technicalities. At the same time no technical detail is missing. This is some achievement! Even the foundational part is a joy to read. You should compare Pontryagin's presentation of the proof of Sard's theorem to Milnor's. The proofs are identical, but for the first time I saw somebody who could outdo Milnor in presenting the proof.
Nov 19, 2012 at 8:32 answer added Mike-Doherty timeline score: 5
Nov 19, 2012 at 7:38 answer added Chris Gerig timeline score: 7
Nov 19, 2012 at 6:34 answer added David C timeline score: 7
Nov 19, 2012 at 5:55 history asked N Zhao CC BY-SA 3.0