Timeline for Non-cyclotomic abelian extensions
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 19, 2012 at 17:13 | comment | added | LMN | Thanks for the link Keith. I think the comments of Lavender Honey and SGP there give a reasonably complete answer. Let P a prime of $\mathbb{Q}$ split in $L$, and consider a quadratic extension $K$ of $L$ ramified at one prime $\mathcal{P}$ over $P$ but not at another $\mathcal{P}'|P$. Suppose $K \subset L*\mathbb{Q}(\mu_\infty)$, then $K$ is obtained by adjoining some element $\alpha \in \mathbb{Q}(\mu_\infty)$ to $L$. However, looking locally at primes of $L(\alpha)$ over $P$ we see that all the local extensions are the same (infact, they are all $Q_p(\alpha)$)$. But, this is diff. from K|L | |
Nov 19, 2012 at 7:08 | comment | added | KConrad | Related post: mathoverflow.net/questions/85775/… | |
Nov 19, 2012 at 5:27 | comment | added | LMN | Thanks Chandan! I guess the argument you had in mind is the same as the one below. | |
Nov 19, 2012 at 5:25 | vote | accept | LMN | ||
Nov 19, 2012 at 5:18 | answer | added | John Pardon | timeline score: 10 | |
Nov 19, 2012 at 5:08 | comment | added | Chandan Singh Dalawat | What prevents $L$ from having an abelian extension which is not even galoisian over $\mathbf{Q}$, let alone abelian over $\mathbf{Q}$ ? Consider for example quadratic extensions of quadratic extensions. | |
Nov 19, 2012 at 4:48 | history | asked | LMN | CC BY-SA 3.0 |