Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 21, 2022 at 9:22 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
replaced the dead link
Oct 17, 2019 at 4:44 comment added mathematics2x2life @MattCuffaro alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete/expositions2012.html
Mar 20, 2019 at 22:00 comment added Matt Cuffaro @PeteL.Clark the link for your lecture notes is broken.
Jan 9, 2010 at 15:02 comment added Anweshi @Pete Clark. Perhaps for the situation of moduli of elliptic curves the expose of Deligne-Rapoport ought to be more accessible than Katz-Mazur.
Jan 9, 2010 at 13:43 comment added user1073 @Pete: This response is really fantastic. Thanks so much!
Jan 9, 2010 at 13:32 vote accept CommunityBot moved from User.Id=1073 by developer User.Id=69903
Jan 9, 2010 at 13:00 comment added Pete L. Clark @TL: That's a useful remark. The trace formula is certainly something that should be in "The Bible of Modular Curves" and is not found in either Shimura or Katz-Mazur.
Jan 9, 2010 at 12:50 comment added Tyler Lawson I can't add much to this fairly comprehensive answer, so I'm going to leave this as a comment. Miyake's book "Modular forms" also covers some ground related to automorphic forms on Shimura curves. It is mostly upper-half-plane stuff in a manner similar to more elementary references than you're looking for with respect to modular curves. However, it at least has the benefit of covering the Eichler-Selberg trace formula (and, correspondingly, some about CM points) for Shimura curves in some detail.
Jan 9, 2010 at 12:32 history edited Pete L. Clark CC BY-SA 2.5
deleted 2 characters in body
Jan 9, 2010 at 12:04 history answered Pete L. Clark CC BY-SA 2.5