Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 9, 2012 at 12:20 history edited Tony Huynh CC BY-SA 3.0
added 822 characters in body
Nov 9, 2012 at 11:56 comment added joro Edited with edges, dumb me...
Nov 9, 2012 at 11:51 comment added Tony Huynh No problem. In that case, the proof still answers your question since the degree 1 assumption implies that the distinguished edges are each at the end of a path component of $M_1 \triangle M_2$, which is all we need.
Nov 9, 2012 at 11:45 comment added joro You are right, sorry. I screwed the question :-(. I meant to ask about distinguished edges with one vertex of degree $1$. Sorry again :(
Nov 9, 2012 at 11:39 comment added Tony Huynh See my comment above. Your examples do not satisfy condition (1), since there cannot be a maximum weight matching which avoids $x,y,z$ for any choice of $x,y,z$.
Nov 9, 2012 at 11:35 comment added joro $C_4$ (and $C_{2k}$) with weights 1 have exactly 2 maximum weighted matchings satisfying the question without deg. 1 restriction.
Nov 9, 2012 at 11:35 comment added Tony Huynh If all weights are 1 and the graph has a perfect matching, then every maximum weight matching will be a perfect matching and hence cover $x,y,z$. So condition (1) will not be satisfied. Not relevant, but this proof also shows that the only graph with exactly two perfect matchings is an even cycle.
Nov 9, 2012 at 11:27 comment added joro Thank you. Are you sure this works if x,y,z are not of degree 1? I think I found a lot of graphs with exactly 2 perfect matchings (weights 1) and the they satisfy my question except for degree 1?
Nov 9, 2012 at 11:05 history undeleted Tony Huynh
Nov 9, 2012 at 11:05 history deleted Tony Huynh
Nov 9, 2012 at 11:04 history edited Tony Huynh CC BY-SA 3.0
added 70 characters in body
Nov 9, 2012 at 10:59 history answered Tony Huynh CC BY-SA 3.0