Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 15, 2020 at 0:14 comment added R. van Dobben de Bruyn One thing that comes to mind is bivariant intersection theory (see e.g. chapter 17 of Fulton), which is used for Riemann–Roch on singular varieties. But this assumes quite a bit about Chow groups already, so it's very far from a ground-up approach to functor of points intersection theory.
Oct 6, 2016 at 2:55 comment added Vladimir Baranovsky Do you mean effective cycles, or arbitrary, up to rational equivalence or by themselves? There is an example of classes of zero cycles on a K3 surface, which - if I remember it right - cannot be represented by a scheme (or even a stack).
Aug 27, 2016 at 6:48 comment added tttbase You might look at Triangulated categories of motives in positive characteristic by Shane Kelly where there is a definition of presheaves of relative cycles.
Jun 23, 2014 at 8:21 comment added jmc @JoeB — Thanks for the references! As I wrote in the edit, by now I'm pretty satisfied with the usual approach. Nevertheless, it sounds interesting, and I will have a look at the papers you mentioned.
Jun 22, 2014 at 19:32 comment added Joe Berner I'm not sure how much this satisfies you, but I did a little bit of a literature search and I found that several people have at least tried to do intersection theory on stacks. It's not exactly what you asked for but at least stacks are done F.O.P. style. In Gillet's "Intersection theory on algebraic stacks and $Q$-varieties" ('84), he says this goes back to Mumford looking at $\mathfrak{M}_g$ in "Towards an enumerative geometry of the moduli space of curves" ('83). I think after that was Gillet paper I mentioned, followed by Vistoli('89), Joshua('99), and more recent work by Gillet('09).
Nov 22, 2013 at 10:04 history edited jmc CC BY-SA 3.0
Improves formatting, adds edit with new info/motivation/literature
Nov 6, 2012 at 3:11 history asked jmc CC BY-SA 3.0