Timeline for Trace inequality for matrices with determinant 1
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2015 at 11:06 | vote | accept | Martijn | ||
| S Sep 4, 2014 at 17:16 | history | suggested | Wolfgang |
added tags
|
|
| Sep 4, 2014 at 17:07 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 4, 2014 at 17:16 | |||||
| Nov 8, 2012 at 5:48 | answer | added | Suvrit | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 7, 2012 at 8:08 | comment | added | Martijn | @Suvrit: How would you fix this? I'm open to suggestions. | |
| Nov 6, 2012 at 18:05 | comment | added | Suvrit | It seems that the question can be "fixed" but since the OP has not edited the question despite fedja's countex, I'm not sure if this fix would be of interest.... | |
| Nov 3, 2012 at 8:20 | history | edited | Martijn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Typo in main formula fixed
|
| Nov 2, 2012 at 15:20 | comment | added | fedja | Anyway, looking at the sheer size, the claim seems fishy: let $A=B$ be the diagonal matrix with the entries $x,1/x$ on the diagonal. Then the LHS is about $x^2$ and the right hand side is about $2x$ as $x\to\infty$. | |
| Nov 2, 2012 at 15:16 | comment | added | fedja | Are the trace operators missing under the square roots on the right? (My guess would be that they are but I'll leave it to the OP to edit them in). | |
| Nov 2, 2012 at 15:06 | history | asked | Martijn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |