Skip to main content
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

This is a repost of a question I posted at MSEMSE.

Mark L. Irons' paper The Curvature and Geodesics of the Torus gives a concise overview of the geodesics on the torus:

  • There are five clear-cut families of geodesics.
  • Most of the geodesics are "ergodic": aperiodic and covering either the entire surface - by spiraling endlessly around - or substantial parts of it.
  • Some of the geodesics are "boring": the meridians, the inner and the outer equator
  • A few of them are "æsthetically pleasing": returning to their starting point after just a few circuits.

Does the structure of geodesics change when twisting the "hose" before gluing its ends?

alt text

E.g., there might be no equators anymore because after twisting the (two) equators lost their "ends".

This is a repost of a question I posted at MSE.

Mark L. Irons' paper The Curvature and Geodesics of the Torus gives a concise overview of the geodesics on the torus:

  • There are five clear-cut families of geodesics.
  • Most of the geodesics are "ergodic": aperiodic and covering either the entire surface - by spiraling endlessly around - or substantial parts of it.
  • Some of the geodesics are "boring": the meridians, the inner and the outer equator
  • A few of them are "æsthetically pleasing": returning to their starting point after just a few circuits.

Does the structure of geodesics change when twisting the "hose" before gluing its ends?

alt text

E.g., there might be no equators anymore because after twisting the (two) equators lost their "ends".

This is a repost of a question I posted at MSE.

Mark L. Irons' paper The Curvature and Geodesics of the Torus gives a concise overview of the geodesics on the torus:

  • There are five clear-cut families of geodesics.
  • Most of the geodesics are "ergodic": aperiodic and covering either the entire surface - by spiraling endlessly around - or substantial parts of it.
  • Some of the geodesics are "boring": the meridians, the inner and the outer equator
  • A few of them are "æsthetically pleasing": returning to their starting point after just a few circuits.

Does the structure of geodesics change when twisting the "hose" before gluing its ends?

alt text

E.g., there might be no equators anymore because after twisting the (two) equators lost their "ends".

replaced http://upload.wikimedia.org/ with https://upload.wikimedia.org/
Source Link

This is a repost of a question I posted at MSE.

Mark L. Irons' paper The Curvature and Geodesics of the Torus gives a concise overview of the geodesics on the torus:

  • There are five clear-cut families of geodesics.
  • Most of the geodesics are "ergodic": aperiodic and covering either the entire surface - by spiraling endlessly around - or substantial parts of it.
  • Some of the geodesics are "boring": the meridians, the inner and the outer equator
  • A few of them are "æsthetically pleasing": returning to their starting point after just a few circuits.

Does the structure of geodesics change when twisting the "hose" before gluing its ends?

alt text http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/Torus_from_rectangle.gifalt text

E.g., there might be no equators anymore because after twisting the (two) equators lost their "ends".

This is a repost of a question I posted at MSE.

Mark L. Irons' paper The Curvature and Geodesics of the Torus gives a concise overview of the geodesics on the torus:

  • There are five clear-cut families of geodesics.
  • Most of the geodesics are "ergodic": aperiodic and covering either the entire surface - by spiraling endlessly around - or substantial parts of it.
  • Some of the geodesics are "boring": the meridians, the inner and the outer equator
  • A few of them are "æsthetically pleasing": returning to their starting point after just a few circuits.

Does the structure of geodesics change when twisting the "hose" before gluing its ends?

alt text http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/Torus_from_rectangle.gif

E.g., there might be no equators anymore because after twisting the (two) equators lost their "ends".

This is a repost of a question I posted at MSE.

Mark L. Irons' paper The Curvature and Geodesics of the Torus gives a concise overview of the geodesics on the torus:

  • There are five clear-cut families of geodesics.
  • Most of the geodesics are "ergodic": aperiodic and covering either the entire surface - by spiraling endlessly around - or substantial parts of it.
  • Some of the geodesics are "boring": the meridians, the inner and the outer equator
  • A few of them are "æsthetically pleasing": returning to their starting point after just a few circuits.

Does the structure of geodesics change when twisting the "hose" before gluing its ends?

alt text

E.g., there might be no equators anymore because after twisting the (two) equators lost their "ends".

deleted 24 characters in body
Source Link
Hans-Peter Stricker
  • 9.7k
  • 5
  • 53
  • 113

This is a repost of a question I posted at MSE.

Mark L. Irons' paper The Curvature and Geodesics of the Torus gives a concise overview of the geodesics on the torus:

  • There are five clear-cut families of geodesics.
  • Most of the geodesics are "ergodic": aperiodic and covering either the entire surface - by spiraling endlessly around - or substantial parts of it.
  • Some of the geodesics are "boring": the meridians, the inner and the outer equator
  • A few of them are "æsthetically pleasing": returning to their starting point after just a few circuits.

CanDoes the structure of geodesics on the torus change drastically when twisting the "hose" before gluing its ends?

alt text http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/Torus_from_rectangle.gif

E.g., there might be no equators anymore because after twisting the (two) equators lost their "ends".

This is a repost of a question I posted at MSE.

Mark L. Irons' paper The Curvature and Geodesics of the Torus gives a concise overview of the geodesics on the torus:

  • There are five clear-cut families of geodesics.
  • Most of the geodesics are "ergodic": aperiodic and covering either the entire surface - by spiraling endlessly around - or substantial parts of it.
  • Some of the geodesics are "boring": the meridians, the inner and the outer equator
  • A few of them are "æsthetically pleasing": returning to their starting point after just a few circuits.

Can the structure of geodesics on the torus change drastically when twisting the "hose" before gluing its ends?

alt text http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/Torus_from_rectangle.gif

E.g., there might be no equators anymore because after twisting the (two) equators lost their "ends".

This is a repost of a question I posted at MSE.

Mark L. Irons' paper The Curvature and Geodesics of the Torus gives a concise overview of the geodesics on the torus:

  • There are five clear-cut families of geodesics.
  • Most of the geodesics are "ergodic": aperiodic and covering either the entire surface - by spiraling endlessly around - or substantial parts of it.
  • Some of the geodesics are "boring": the meridians, the inner and the outer equator
  • A few of them are "æsthetically pleasing": returning to their starting point after just a few circuits.

Does the structure of geodesics change when twisting the "hose" before gluing its ends?

alt text http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/60/Torus_from_rectangle.gif

E.g., there might be no equators anymore because after twisting the (two) equators lost their "ends".

Source Link
Hans-Peter Stricker
  • 9.7k
  • 5
  • 53
  • 113
Loading