Timeline for A question about the comparability of large cardinals.
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2012 at 18:07 | comment | added | Garabed Gulbenkian | I must also thank you, Asaf, for doing such a wonderful editing job on my post. I had no idea what to do to get out of the mess I had made with the end of it. | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 18:00 | comment | added | Garabed Gulbenkian | Thanks for pointing out to me how many examples can be constructed of pairs of large cardinal axioms (which cannot be proved in ZFC) and which satisfy my conditions. I am trying to get a picture of how far up into the set-theoretical hierarchy one can reach with a collection C of large cardinal axioms whose cardinal numbers are totally ordered by size, and whose conjunction is not known to be inconsistent with ZFC. Pairs of axioms which satisfy my conditions should probably not both belong to C. | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 14:32 | vote | accept | Garabed Gulbenkian | ||
| Oct 23, 2012 at 6:28 | comment | added | Goldstern | See also mathoverflow.net/questions/63735/… | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 21:30 | history | answered | Goldstern | CC BY-SA 3.0 |