Timeline for Do all curves have Néron models
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:19 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.stackexchange.com/ with https://math.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Oct 24, 2012 at 22:49 | history | edited | Qing Liu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Oct 24, 2012 at 22:47 | answer | added | Qing Liu | timeline score: 30 | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 7:25 | history | edited | Harry | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Oct 23, 2012 at 7:24 | comment | added | Harry | My apologies. In the course of editing the original question posted on stackexchange I reversed some of the statements. What I meant is that it's easy to see that the weak Neron property holds for $\mathcal{X}$ when $X$ has good reduction over $O_K$. This statement is only slightly harder to prove when $X$ doesn't have good reduction. I'll edit the question accordingly. | |
| Oct 23, 2012 at 6:29 | comment | added | Damian Rössler | Why is it clear when $X$ has good reduction over ${\cal O}_K$ ? (I can see that for the "weak Néron property" - but why in general ?). | |
| Oct 22, 2012 at 22:50 | history | edited | user9072 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added accents
|
| Oct 22, 2012 at 19:38 | history | asked | Harry | CC BY-SA 3.0 |