Timeline for Maximizing the number of lattice points in a circle of radius $r$ placed on a lattice
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 21, 2012 at 21:47 | vote | accept | user27203 | ||
Oct 21, 2012 at 19:11 | comment | added | Michael Biro | Depending on what you mean by small, I think so. Given $r$ and a square, look at all lattice points that are in the circle for some center in the square but not in the circle for a different center. There are $O(r)$ of these points and if you take the arrangement of radius $r$ circles centered at these lattice points, we get $O(r^2)$ faces, where two circles of radius $r$ with centers in the same face in the square contain the same lattice points. So, there are at most $O(r^2)$ different values the function can take, even without looking for peaks, and most small movements won't matter at all. | |
Oct 21, 2012 at 18:05 | comment | added | user27203 | Ahem, peaks in terms of the number of lattice points internal to the circle. | |
Oct 21, 2012 at 18:04 | comment | added | user27203 | @Michael Biro If a circle of radius $r$ were to execute something like a Brownian motion on a lattice, would we really only expect peaks when its center drifts over a small set of points in the fundamental unit of the Z^2 or A^2 lattices? | |
Oct 21, 2012 at 17:37 | comment | added | user27203 | @Michael Biro "I want to say that by symmetry, the only relevant centers are lattice points, midpoints of square edges, and centers of squares..." right, I think that makes a lot of sense... but is there any way to make this statement rigorous? | |
Oct 21, 2012 at 16:58 | history | answered | Michael Biro | CC BY-SA 3.0 |