Skip to main content
added 23 characters in body
Source Link
Pietro Majer
  • 60.5k
  • 4
  • 122
  • 269

The assumption implies $\mathrm{ran}(A)=\mathrm{ran}(A^k)$, hence also $\mathrm{ker}(A)=\mathrm{ker}(A^k)$, for all $k\in\mathbb{N}$. The algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue $\lambda$ of the matrix $A$ is $\max _ {k\in\mathbb{N}} \mathrm{dim} \ker (A-\lambda)^k $ (think e.g. to the Jordan form of $A$). So in your caseassumption the algebraic and geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue $0$ coincide (and conversely).

The assumption implies $\mathrm{ran}(A)=\mathrm{ran}(A^k)$, hence also $\mathrm{ker}(A)=\mathrm{ker}(A^k)$, for all $k\in\mathbb{N}$. The algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue $\lambda$ of the matrix $A$ is $\max _ {k\in\mathbb{N}} \mathrm{dim} \ker (A-\lambda)^k $ (think e.g. to the Jordan form of $A$). So in your case the algebraic and geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue $0$ coincide.

The assumption implies $\mathrm{ran}(A)=\mathrm{ran}(A^k)$, hence also $\mathrm{ker}(A)=\mathrm{ker}(A^k)$, for all $k\in\mathbb{N}$. The algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue $\lambda$ of the matrix $A$ is $\max _ {k\in\mathbb{N}} \mathrm{dim} \ker (A-\lambda)^k $ (think e.g. to the Jordan form of $A$). So in your assumption the algebraic and geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue $0$ coincide (and conversely).

Source Link
Pietro Majer
  • 60.5k
  • 4
  • 122
  • 269

The assumption implies $\mathrm{ran}(A)=\mathrm{ran}(A^k)$, hence also $\mathrm{ker}(A)=\mathrm{ker}(A^k)$, for all $k\in\mathbb{N}$. The algebraic multiplicity of an eigenvalue $\lambda$ of the matrix $A$ is $\max _ {k\in\mathbb{N}} \mathrm{dim} \ker (A-\lambda)^k $ (think e.g. to the Jordan form of $A$). So in your case the algebraic and geometric multiplicity of the eigenvalue $0$ coincide.