Timeline for A categorical framework for Freiman s-morphisms
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2012 at 22:05 | history | edited | Salvo Tringali | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed a couple of typos
|
| Oct 16, 2012 at 16:26 | answer | added | user9072 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 16, 2012 at 15:25 | history | edited | Salvo Tringali | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 24 characters in body; deleted 24 characters in body
|
| Oct 16, 2012 at 15:14 | history | edited | Salvo Tringali | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
corrected some significant mistakes
|
| Oct 16, 2012 at 14:52 | comment | added | user9072 | Whether or not what you define is really just a group homomorphism aside (I think you are right in that eg for s=2 you could in addition to a hom translate by an element of order 2, but that's it), your definition still seems strange to me. In all applications I know of the point is that the def of a Freiman hom is for subsets of groups not the full group. Do you mean this, or really what you wrote. | |
| Oct 16, 2012 at 14:33 | history | edited | Salvo Tringali | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed LaTeX
|
| Oct 16, 2012 at 14:33 | comment | added | Buschi Sergio | FOr $s>1$ I seems that a Freiman morphism is merely a group morphism (Posing $y_2=y_3=\ldots y_n= 1$). I'm wrong? | |
| Oct 16, 2012 at 14:16 | history | asked | Salvo Tringali | CC BY-SA 3.0 |