Timeline for Polarizable variations of (mixed) Hodge structures
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2012 at 16:53 | vote | accept | Reladenine Vakalwe | ||
| Oct 15, 2012 at 16:53 | comment | added | Reladenine Vakalwe | Ah yes! This does it. | |
| Oct 15, 2012 at 16:04 | comment | added | Donu Arapura | I added some remarks about this. Unfortunately, I have to finish some other stuff. I might flesh it out later. | |
| Oct 15, 2012 at 16:02 | history | edited | Donu Arapura | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 332 characters in body
|
| Oct 15, 2012 at 15:38 | comment | added | Reladenine Vakalwe | This is about what I had interpreted when (trying to) wade through "Modules de Hodge...". However, there is something that is unclear to me (which is what prompted the original question): Saito requires a pairing satisfying the inductive conditions. Over a point this pairing is perfect. I don't understand why the conditions imply the pairing is "perfect" (= induces Verdier self-duality) in general. My naive picture is that the polarization should induce a polarization on each stalk, but I don't see this from the conditions (or a result to this effect in the paper). Is there a simple reason? | |
| Oct 15, 2012 at 13:22 | history | answered | Donu Arapura | CC BY-SA 3.0 |