Timeline for What are the points of Spec(Vassiliev Invariants)?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| S Aug 10, 2013 at 3:32 | history | suggested | Michael Albanese | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Replaced \\# by \# and > by >.
|
| Aug 10, 2013 at 2:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 10, 2013 at 3:32 | |||||
| Apr 1, 2010 at 7:49 | answer | added | Dylan Thurston | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 8, 2010 at 22:58 | vote | accept | Theo Johnson-Freyd | ||
| Jan 7, 2010 at 1:01 | comment | added | Daniel Moskovich | I will promote the tag "quantum topology" as being superior in this context to "quantum algebra", for reasons which you mentioned. Vassiliev invariants are not quantum algebra (although for knots, quantum invariants and Vassiliev invariants basically coincide), but they are quantum topology! | |
| Jan 7, 2010 at 0:26 | answer | added | Ryan Budney | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 23:08 | history | edited | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
corrected an error
|
| Jan 6, 2010 at 22:54 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | And, per Ilya N's suggestion, a title that's more in line with the question at the end (I originally titled it before writing the whole question, and forgot to go back and change the title, sorry). | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 22:53 | history | edited | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
changed title
|
| Jan 6, 2010 at 21:41 | answer | added | Daniel Moskovich | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 20:47 | answer | added | Ilya Nikokoshev | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 20:20 | history | edited | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added a link
|
| Jan 6, 2010 at 20:19 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | Ilya's totally right. Perhaps I'll also break up the main question, but that will have to wait a few hours. | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 20:12 | history | edited | Ilya Nikokoshev | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
more fixes
|
| Jan 6, 2010 at 20:07 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | @Ilya: Perhaps, although it's almost entirely expository. I don't really think that I'll get an answer, but there's some chance that there's a paper out there that I haven't come across which get's much closer to a description of each of these objects. But, ok, I'll make the warm-up question a different question. | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 20:02 | history | edited | Ilya Nikokoshev | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
formatting
|
| Jan 6, 2010 at 20:01 | comment | added | Theo Johnson-Freyd | I like that I can tag this "qa.quantum-algebra" even though every Hopf algebra in sight is commutative and cocommutative. | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 20:00 | history | asked | Theo Johnson-Freyd | CC BY-SA 2.5 |