Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Oct 13, 2012 at 21:57 vote accept CommunityBot
Oct 12, 2012 at 9:14 history edited user5810 CC BY-SA 3.0
specified ring isomorphisms
Oct 12, 2012 at 8:24 answer added Sidney Raffer timeline score: 1
Oct 12, 2012 at 7:56 comment added S. Carnahan Yes, I would also like to know if $\phi$ is an isomorphism of rings, abelian groups, sets, $F[x]$-modules, or something else. Right now, the question is rather underspecified.
Oct 12, 2012 at 7:37 comment added Noah Stein @S. Carnahan: If so, $\psi$ would always exist even for $\phi$ without an inverse because $F[x]$ is free.
Oct 12, 2012 at 6:47 comment added S. Carnahan Do you demand that $\phi$ be $F$-linear?
Oct 12, 2012 at 6:33 history asked user5810 CC BY-SA 3.0