Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 16, 2012 at 10:28 vote accept Stefano Capparelli
S Oct 16, 2012 at 10:28 vote accept Stefano Capparelli
Oct 16, 2012 at 10:28
Oct 16, 2012 at 10:27 vote accept Stefano Capparelli
S Oct 16, 2012 at 10:28
Oct 11, 2012 at 18:06 answer added Ira Gessel timeline score: 12
Oct 11, 2012 at 14:32 answer added Pietro Majer timeline score: 10
Oct 11, 2012 at 13:30 comment added Martin Rubey Yes it does. All I'm saying is that $f$ and $g$ can be first understood as infinite series without changing the value. In a second step we replace $n$ in the summands by a continues variable $x$, which again doesn't change the value for integer $x$. This explains how mathematica arrives at the nice closed forms.
Oct 11, 2012 at 13:16 comment added Andreas Blass It seems to me that the vanishing of $\binom{n+k}{2k}$ for $n>k$ depends on $n$'s being an integer.
Oct 11, 2012 at 13:03 comment added Martin Rubey For $k>n$ the first binomial in $f(n)$ vanishes, for $k>n-1$ the first binomial in $g(n)$ vanishes. So you can ignore the upper limit, i.e. replace it with infinity.
Oct 11, 2012 at 12:40 comment added Andreas Blass When non-integer $n$ (or $x$) occurs as the upper bound on a summation, I'd interpret the sum as ranging just over integers below that bound. And I'd interpret binomial coefficients $\binom{y}{m}$, with integer $m$ but non-integer $y$, as polynomials in $y$. So I'd get piecewise polynomial results for the sum. Apparently, Mathematica interprets things differently than I do --- but how? Maybe the sums become infinite series, because it keeps adding terms until the summation variable equals the upper bound?
Oct 11, 2012 at 11:49 history asked Stefano Capparelli CC BY-SA 3.0