Skip to main content

Timeline for heegard diagram

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 9, 2014 at 19:11 comment added Kevin Walker In the lens space example, the two curves of the Heegaard diagram are (1) a $-p/q$ curve on $\partial N$, and (2) a curve which bounds a disk in $S^3\setminus N$, i.e. a longitude.
Sep 9, 2014 at 16:31 comment added Manuel Bärenz How does this work for example for a Lens space $L(p,q)$? That's just $-p/q$-surgery on the unknot. (1) So we take $N = S^1 \times D^2 \stackrel{\text{unknot }-p/q}{\hookrightarrow} S^3$. (2) We don't need any 1-handles since there are no crossings. $H = N$. (3) I can only guess what you mean by this step. I'm drawing the circle ${0} \times \partial D^2 \subset \partial H$. (4) What exactly are the surgery curves on $N$? In particular, for general $p,q$, the curve must go around $H$ several times? I take it this is just the torus knot?
Oct 11, 2012 at 14:30 history edited Kevin Walker CC BY-SA 3.0
small correction
Oct 11, 2012 at 14:18 comment added Kevin Walker ... Put another way, the output is a surface with two sets of curves, not two handlebodies with a homeomorphism between their boundaries.
Oct 11, 2012 at 14:13 comment added Kevin Walker I agree that the outline is rough, but on the other hand the question asked for an algorithm, not a proof that the algorithm was correct. ... Actually, I don't understand your comment. I don't think I ever have to mention or think about Dehn twists, and I think what I wrote works fine for non-unit and even non-integer surgeries.
Oct 11, 2012 at 8:32 comment added Daniel Moskovich This is a nice very-rough-outline! There's the "digging a trench" construction needed to prove that surgery along the curve gives rise to Dehn twists on the handlebody; you also have to do something non-trivial to deal with non-unit framings.
Oct 10, 2012 at 16:38 vote accept mark
Oct 10, 2012 at 16:05 history answered Kevin Walker CC BY-SA 3.0