Timeline for When should I publish my results?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2019 at 14:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 13, 2019 at 12:43 | |||||
| Feb 26, 2019 at 13:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 26, 2019 at 22:23 | |||||
| Nov 30, 2017 at 4:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 30, 2017 at 11:22 | |||||
| Oct 22, 2017 at 18:54 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 23, 2017 at 6:21 | |||||
| Feb 5, 2013 at 15:36 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | Even if you write it up and submit it, only to have it rejected as unoriginal... it will be a useful learning experience. | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 16:09 | comment | added | Aaron Hoffman | There is very little out there that could not be regarded, by a sufficiently modest mathematician, as repeating arguments of others in a slightly more general form. Evaluating the merit of one's own work is psychologically complicated, particularly at the beginning of one's career. I second Thierry Zell's advice to defer to the more experienced and independent referee absent evidence to distrust him or her. | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 15:04 | comment | added | Thierry Zell | Unless you have reasons to believe that the referee is not very representative of your shared academic community, why not trust the referee's advice? | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 11:46 | answer | added | Felix Goldberg | timeline score: 16 | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 10:35 | comment | added | András Bátkai | I was also wondering. However, publishing etiquette is strongly mathematics related. | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 10:07 | comment | added | Dirk | This question could also have been asked at academia.stackexchange.com | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 9:19 | answer | added | András Bátkai | timeline score: 30 | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 8:18 | history | asked | anonymous | CC BY-SA 3.0 |