Timeline for A "geometric" insight into a proof of Krull intersection theorem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2022 at 8:13 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://math.uga.edu/~pete with http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~pete
|
|
| Dec 2, 2015 at 9:54 | comment | added | user20948 | @FrançoisBrunault How does Artin-Rees lemma have a more geometric flavor? Its proof is related to blowup algebra, but I don't know how to interpret this proof and the theorem geometrically. | |
| Oct 8, 2012 at 19:55 | comment | added | François Brunault | There is another result, called the Artin-Rees lemma, which implies Krull's intersection theorem. The proofs I know are more complicated than the one you mention, but the Artin-Rees lemma is also related to Krull's Hauptidealsatz which has clearly a more geometric flavour. You could try to look at the following article : D. Rees, Two classical theorems of ideal theory. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 52 (1956), 155–157. | |
| Oct 8, 2012 at 18:57 | answer | added | Karl Schwede | timeline score: 16 | |
| Oct 8, 2012 at 17:19 | history | asked | aglearner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |