Timeline for Intuition for Group Cohomology
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2017 at 17:54 | answer | added | user19475 | timeline score: 2 | |
| S Jun 10, 2017 at 17:41 | history | suggested | Colectivo |
added cohomology tag
|
|
| Jun 10, 2017 at 17:25 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 10, 2017 at 17:41 | |||||
| Nov 13, 2012 at 21:16 | history | edited | David Corwin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 64 characters in body; added 78 characters in body
|
| Jul 16, 2012 at 0:41 | comment | added | David Corwin | See ncatlab.org/davidcorfield/show/intuitions+about+cohomology for further examples about other kinds of cohomology | |
| Jun 7, 2011 at 23:32 | answer | added | paul garrett | timeline score: 27 | |
| Sep 5, 2010 at 17:20 | comment | added | David Corwin | @Steven: I agree that that book is quite nice, though as far as I can tell, it doesn't seem to give particularly nice intuition for group cohomology. | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 18:05 | history | edited | David Corwin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Aug 31, 2010 at 17:12 | comment | added | Steven Gubkin | The best treatment of group cohomology which I have seen is the the book "lectures on algebraic geometry 1" by Gunter Harder. Check it out. | |
| Aug 31, 2010 at 16:56 | history | edited | David Corwin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
improved formatting; deleted 155 characters in body; added 18 characters in body; added 22 characters in body
|
| Jul 28, 2010 at 14:57 | answer | added | Roy | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 28, 2010 at 12:46 | history | edited | David Corwin |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 28, 2010 at 12:46 | answer | added | David Corwin | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 6, 2010 at 18:10 | history | edited | David Corwin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 200 characters in body
|
| Jan 18, 2010 at 6:35 | history | edited | David Corwin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 155 characters in body
|
| Jan 8, 2010 at 3:09 | answer | added | JSE | timeline score: 25 | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 20:12 | answer | added | tkr | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 12:53 | comment | added | Leonid Positselski | A similar question has been discussed at mathoverflow.net/questions/8599/… | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 9:46 | answer | added | Georges Elencwajg | timeline score: 61 | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 6:56 | answer | added | Peter McNamara | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 6:06 | comment | added | S. Carnahan♦ | I should point out that this is not ordinary group cohomology, but Tate cohomology, which has some minor alterations to make it 2-periodic. | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 5:33 | answer | added | Josh | timeline score: 17 | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 4:30 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | Some of the answers in this related question deal with group cohomology: mathoverflow.net/questions/640/… | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 4:23 | answer | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 6, 2010 at 4:19 | history | asked | David Corwin | CC BY-SA 2.5 |