Skip to main content
added 16 characters in body
Source Link
Anton Klyachko
  • 3.9k
  • 21
  • 40

No. There is a variation of Tarski monster: a nonabelian group whose each proper nontrivial subgroup is infinite cyclic, see the book of Olshanskii.

Concerning Misha's comment. For any countable family of countable involution-free groups $G_1,G_2,\dots$, there is a group $H$ containing all $G_i$ as proper subgroups such that each proper subgroup of $H$ is either infinite cyclic or a conjugate of a subgroup of some $G_i$. This is Obraztsov's embedding theorem.

No. There is a variation of Tarski monster: a nonabelian group whose each proper nontrivial subgroup is infinite cyclic, see the book of Olshanskii.

Concerning Misha's comment. For any countable family of countable groups $G_1,G_2,\dots$, there is a group $H$ containing all $G_i$ as proper subgroups such that each proper subgroup of $H$ is either infinite cyclic or a conjugate of a subgroup of some $G_i$. This is Obraztsov's embedding theorem.

No. There is a variation of Tarski monster: a nonabelian group whose each proper nontrivial subgroup is infinite cyclic, see the book of Olshanskii.

Concerning Misha's comment. For any countable family of countable involution-free groups $G_1,G_2,\dots$, there is a group $H$ containing all $G_i$ as proper subgroups such that each proper subgroup of $H$ is either infinite cyclic or a conjugate of a subgroup of some $G_i$. This is Obraztsov's embedding theorem.

added 10 characters in body
Source Link
Anton Klyachko
  • 3.9k
  • 21
  • 40

No. There is a variation of Tarski monster: a nonabelian group whose each proper nontrivial subgroup is infinite cyclic, see the book of Olshanskii.

Concerning Misha's comment. For any countable family of countable groups $G_1,G_2,\dots$, there is a group $H$ containing all $G_i$ as proper subgroups such that each proper subgroup of $H$ is either infinite cyclic or a conjugate of a subgroup of some $G_i$. This is Obraztsov's embedding theorem.

No. There is a variation of Tarski monster: a nonabelian group whose each proper nontrivial subgroup is infinite cyclic, see the book of Olshanskii.

Concerning Misha's comment. For any countable family of groups $G_1,G_2,\dots$, there is a group $H$ containing all $G_i$ as proper subgroups such that each proper subgroup of $H$ is either infinite cyclic or a conjugate of a subgroup of some $G_i$. This is Obraztsov's embedding theorem.

No. There is a variation of Tarski monster: a nonabelian group whose each proper nontrivial subgroup is infinite cyclic, see the book of Olshanskii.

Concerning Misha's comment. For any countable family of countable groups $G_1,G_2,\dots$, there is a group $H$ containing all $G_i$ as proper subgroups such that each proper subgroup of $H$ is either infinite cyclic or a conjugate of a subgroup of some $G_i$. This is Obraztsov's embedding theorem.

added 384 characters in body; added 1 characters in body
Source Link
Anton Klyachko
  • 3.9k
  • 21
  • 40

No. There is a variation of Tarski monster: a nonabelian group whose each proper nontrivial subgroup is infinite cyclic, see the book of Olshanskii.

Concerning Misha's comment. For any countable family of groups $G_1,G_2,\dots$, there is a group $H$ containing all $G_i$ as proper subgroups such that each proper subgroup of $H$ is either infinite cyclic or a conjugate of a subgroup of some $G_i$. This is Obraztsov's embedding theorem.

No. There is a variation of Tarski monster: a nonabelian group whose each proper nontrivial subgroup is infinite cyclic, see the book of Olshanskii.

No. There is a variation of Tarski monster: a nonabelian group whose each proper nontrivial subgroup is infinite cyclic, see the book of Olshanskii.

Concerning Misha's comment. For any countable family of groups $G_1,G_2,\dots$, there is a group $H$ containing all $G_i$ as proper subgroups such that each proper subgroup of $H$ is either infinite cyclic or a conjugate of a subgroup of some $G_i$. This is Obraztsov's embedding theorem.

Source Link
Anton Klyachko
  • 3.9k
  • 21
  • 40
Loading