Timeline for Showing morphism of sheaves is zero
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2012 at 18:38 | vote | accept | Reladenine Vakalwe | ||
| Sep 30, 2012 at 18:37 | vote | accept | Reladenine Vakalwe | ||
| Sep 30, 2012 at 18:38 | |||||
| Sep 30, 2012 at 18:33 | answer | added | Dustin Clausen | timeline score: 9 | |
| Sep 30, 2012 at 17:01 | comment | added | Reladenine Vakalwe | These are complexes of sheaves in the derived category, so I am especially skeptical of your claim. Not saying it's wrong, just don't see why, care to elaborate? | |
| Sep 30, 2012 at 16:43 | comment | added | Justin Campbell | I think a sheaf on $X$ is equivalent to a sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $U$, a sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ on $Y$, and a morphism $i^*j_*\mathcal{F} \to \mathcal{G}$. This implies your claim, right? | |
| Sep 30, 2012 at 16:16 | history | asked | Reladenine Vakalwe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |