Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 12, 2017 at 0:14 vote accept john mangual
May 11, 2017 at 13:18 history edited Todd Trimble CC BY-SA 3.0
the coproduct topology rules out the type of example proposed by John Mangual
Aug 20, 2010 at 3:52 history edited Pete L. Clark CC BY-SA 2.5
added 1 characters in body
Jan 5, 2010 at 23:35 comment added Mariano Suárez-Álvarez That sequence does not converge to zero---I have not made any claim about the resulting space.
Jan 5, 2010 at 23:26 comment added john mangual @Mariano I might buy this in the monotonic case. However, if we let the radii be 1 + 1/n the points (0, 2 + 2/n) (antipodal to (0,0) converge to (0,2) which does not lie in any circle. So, this space is also not compact.
Jan 5, 2010 at 21:03 comment added Mariano Suárez-Álvarez @Anweshi: the special point in an infinite wedge of circles does not have a countable basis of neighborhoods, so in particular that wedge is not metrizable and, as a consequence, it is not a subspace of $\mathbb R^2$.
Jan 5, 2010 at 21:01 comment added Anweshi @Mariano. Supposing a_n goes to infinity. Then we should get the wedge. If a_n goes to zero, then it should be the Hawaiian. No?
Jan 5, 2010 at 21:00 history edited Mariano Suárez-Álvarez CC BY-SA 2.5
added 294 characters in body
Jan 5, 2010 at 20:59 comment added Anweshi Oops, I screwed by deleting my comment and re-posting in a different form.. The one of mine above, should have been the first. Sorry.
Jan 5, 2010 at 20:57 comment added Anweshi That is the wedge of infinitely many circles. Isn't that non-homeomorphic to the Hawaiian?
Jan 5, 2010 at 20:57 comment added Mariano Suárez-Álvarez In the wedge of infinitely many circles, you can construct a sequence (whose points are the antipodal points in each circle, of the joining point) which does not have a convergent subsequence: the wedge is, therefore, not compact.
Jan 5, 2010 at 20:57 comment added john mangual See Example 1.25 in "Algebraic Topology" by Allen Hatcher. The Hawaiian Earring has a different fundamental group than the infinite wedge of circles.
Jan 5, 2010 at 20:50 history answered Mariano Suárez-Álvarez CC BY-SA 2.5