Skip to main content
18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Jul 29, 2017 at 4:42 history suggested Martin Sleziak
removed deprecated (geometry) tag - see the tag info: http://mathoverflow.net/tags/geometry/info; if there are some other geometry-related tags which are suitable, please use some of them instead
Jul 29, 2017 at 4:19 review Suggested edits
S Jul 29, 2017 at 4:42
Jul 28, 2017 at 23:41 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
Image links broken; now fixed.
Oct 1, 2012 at 11:25 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @Will: You are right! I didn't think through surfaces carefully. One could take a simple, closed geodesic and its parallels.
Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 answer added Cristi Stoica timeline score: 1
Oct 1, 2012 at 4:31 comment added Will Sawin Isn't this question trivial for regions like the sphere which have no boundary?
Oct 1, 2012 at 4:16 answer added Will Sawin timeline score: 1
Oct 1, 2012 at 3:44 answer added Sergei Ivanov timeline score: 4
Sep 30, 2012 at 23:39 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
added 348 characters in body
Sep 30, 2012 at 22:04 comment added Cristi Stoica You can merge two opposite quarters of the circle only by using zig-zags as in i.imgur.com/Z4yri.gif . This suggests the following fun but unhelpful trick. Any planar region as described can be approximated as good as we want by a region which can be covered by only one herringbone region. The approximation will be bounded by a curve made only of horizontal and vertical lines (i.imgur.com/GxJKw.gif)
Sep 30, 2012 at 14:03 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @Sergei: I should have specified the regions should be connected. Convex would also be interesting. Clever to connect opposite quarters!
Sep 30, 2012 at 11:28 comment added Sergei Ivanov Should regions be connected? Convex? If not, you can merge two opposite quarters of the circle into one region.
Sep 29, 2012 at 23:16 comment added Joseph O'Rourke @unknown: Good question! It is not so clear, is it? ... Let me tentatively stipulate: a geodesic and its parallels (which might not themselves be geodesics). Each "parallel" has a fixed distance separation from the generating geodesic.
Sep 29, 2012 at 23:13 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
added 5 characters in body
Sep 29, 2012 at 23:06 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
added 41 characters in body; added 9 characters in body
Sep 29, 2012 at 22:56 comment added John Pardon I understand the question for flat surfaces, but what do you mean by parallel lines on the surface of a sphere or a more complicated curved surface?
Sep 29, 2012 at 22:22 history edited Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0
added 6 characters in body
Sep 29, 2012 at 22:05 history asked Joseph O'Rourke CC BY-SA 3.0