Timeline for Decomposition of Matrices in Semisimple and Nilpotent Parts
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Feb 8, 2017 at 23:07 | history | suggested | asmeurer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed link
|
| Feb 8, 2017 at 22:52 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 8, 2017 at 23:07 | |||||
| Oct 3, 2012 at 21:57 | vote | accept | Miguel | ||
| Sep 30, 2012 at 15:38 | answer | added | Jim Humphreys | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 30, 2012 at 10:00 | comment | added | BS. | There is no uniqueness if you don't require that the two matrices in the decomposition commute. | |
| Sep 29, 2012 at 14:27 | answer | added | Laurent Berger | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 29, 2012 at 12:24 | comment | added | Anton Klyachko | Also $L$ is redundant. You may take $L=E$ (the identity matrix). | |
| Sep 29, 2012 at 11:56 | history | asked | Miguel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |