Skip to main content
Added link to Arias-de-Reyna
Source Link
Stopple
  • 11.1k
  • 3
  • 43
  • 65

Yes, Speiser's theorem is an if and only if.

See Theorem 1 and "Corollary to Theorem 1" in Levinson and Montgomery's Zeros of the derivatives of the Riemann Zeta-function. Acta Math. 133 (1974), 49–65.


Edit: An English language explication of Speiser's proof can be found in Arias-de-Reyna's X-ray of Riemann Zeta Function

Yes, Speiser's theorem is an if and only if.

See Theorem 1 and "Corollary to Theorem 1" in Levinson and Montgomery's Zeros of the derivatives of the Riemann Zeta-function. Acta Math. 133 (1974), 49–65.

Yes, Speiser's theorem is an if and only if.

See Theorem 1 and "Corollary to Theorem 1" in Levinson and Montgomery's Zeros of the derivatives of the Riemann Zeta-function. Acta Math. 133 (1974), 49–65.


Edit: An English language explication of Speiser's proof can be found in Arias-de-Reyna's X-ray of Riemann Zeta Function

Yes, Speiser's theorem is an if and only if.

See Theorem 1 and "Corollary to Theorem 1" in Levinson and Montgomery's Zeros of the derivatives of the Riemann Zeta-functionZeros of the derivatives of the Riemann Zeta-function. Acta Math. 133 (1974), 49–65.

Yes, Speiser's theorem is an if and only if.

See Theorem 1 and "Corollary to Theorem 1" in Levinson and Montgomery's Zeros of the derivatives of the Riemann Zeta-function. Acta Math. 133 (1974), 49–65.

Yes, Speiser's theorem is an if and only if.

See Theorem 1 and "Corollary to Theorem 1" in Levinson and Montgomery's Zeros of the derivatives of the Riemann Zeta-function. Acta Math. 133 (1974), 49–65.

Source Link
Mark Lewko
  • 13k
  • 1
  • 55
  • 87

Yes, Speiser's theorem is an if and only if.

See Theorem 1 and "Corollary to Theorem 1" in Levinson and Montgomery's Zeros of the derivatives of the Riemann Zeta-function. Acta Math. 133 (1974), 49–65.