Timeline for Finite Subgroups of $SL_2(R)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 26, 2012 at 2:53 | vote | accept | i. m. soloveichik | ||
Sep 26, 2012 at 0:44 | comment | added | i. m. soloveichik | So I think your argument might work over any field (of $char\ne 0$) so that the roots of unity in the field is just $\pm 1$. N'est pas? | |
Sep 25, 2012 at 19:07 | vote | accept | i. m. soloveichik | ||
Sep 26, 2012 at 2:53 | |||||
Sep 25, 2012 at 15:08 | comment | added | YCor | you're right, they're order 4 (if you diagonalize $H$ over complex, it's antidiagonal matrices of determinant 1). I edited accordingly. | |
Sep 25, 2012 at 15:06 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected order 2 issue.
|
Sep 25, 2012 at 14:25 | comment | added | John Shareshian | I am confused by the claim in the third paragraph of the original argument that all elements of $N \setminus Z$ have order two. Consider the cyclic subgroup $H$ of $GL_2({\mathbb C})$ generated by a diagonal matrix whose diagonal entries are the two primitive cube roots of $1$. Let $x$ be a $2 \times 2$ matrix whose diagonal elements are zero and whose off diagonal elements are $1$ and $-1$. Then $x$ has order four and normalizes but does not centralize $H$. Maybe I am missing something. If I am, could you finish instead by noting that $SL_2({\mathbf R})$ has one element of order two? | |
Sep 25, 2012 at 7:17 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1796 characters in body
|
Sep 23, 2012 at 21:34 | history | answered | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |