Timeline for Mackey(also Green and Tambara) functors and Greenlees-May
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2012 at 22:57 | vote | accept | confusedmath | ||
| Sep 19, 2012 at 2:16 | comment | added | confusedmath | @PeterMay Also, I was wondering if there are analogous theorems for Green/Tambara functors. Are all Green (resp.Tambara) functors built from "simpler" Green (resp. Tambara) functors? | |
| Sep 19, 2012 at 2:07 | comment | added | confusedmath | @PeterMay Thank you for your response! That makes much more sense now. Personally, the definition on the bottom of page 238 (definition 1) of $RV$ in terms of the $H-$fixed points seems more natural. Is there is a way to see $ker$ and $coker$ being in $\mathcal{A}$ without appealing to the explicit construction given on the top of page 239? My second question is not directly related to your paper. I was simply asking (in general) as to what one gains from having a Green or Tambara functor instead of a run-of-the-mill Mackey functor. I will edit as to make this distinction clear. Thanks! | |
| Sep 18, 2012 at 20:36 | history | answered | Peter May | CC BY-SA 3.0 |