Timeline for "A gentleman never chooses a basis."
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jan 18, 2017 at 18:30 | history | suggested | LSpice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Cut-and-pasted from http://mathoverflow.net/a/107429/2383, per http://mathoverflow.net/questions/400/a-gentleman-never-chooses-a-basis#comment276705_107429
|
| Jan 18, 2017 at 18:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 18, 2017 at 18:30 | |||||
| Sep 17, 2012 at 22:54 | comment | added | Peter Samuelson | To be pedantic, in the case of f.g. projective modules over a commutative ring, "dual basis theorem" is a slightly unfortunate name, since neither $\{e_i\}$ or $\{f_i\}$ are necessarily bases of $V$ or $DV$. | |
| Sep 17, 2012 at 18:52 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Yes, this is a nice argument, Peter. | |
| Sep 17, 2012 at 18:36 | history | answered | Peter May | CC BY-SA 3.0 |