Timeline for Who named it the Snake Lemma?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 22, 2013 at 17:25 | review | Close votes | |||
Dec 22, 2013 at 21:10 | |||||
Sep 12, 2012 at 21:59 | comment | added | anon | @Andrew Stacey. Sorry, I still don't understand the point of your post. And the implementation of how to fix the slanting arrows was already in the linked document long before you posted your diagram. | |
Sep 12, 2012 at 21:11 | comment | added | anon | @Andrew Stacy. Except for the line thickness, the color, and the "snake", which are totally different from your diagram, the code in the linked document is very standard tikz code, so I don't understand the point of your last comment. Incidentally, your diagram is very similar to the original "diagramme du serpent" in Bourbaki 1961, and so illustrates how to get a classical diagram in tikz, whereas the other diagram illustrates what is possible in tikz (which, after all, is the point of the document). | |
Sep 12, 2012 at 18:13 | vote | accept | Adam Epstein | ||
Sep 12, 2012 at 16:14 | comment | added | Sean Tilson | My personal favorite: math.wayne.edu/~mike/SnakeLemma.pdf I am biased though. He used xy. | |
Sep 12, 2012 at 15:07 | comment | added | Suvrit | @Lennart: but i think Andrew's drawing looks more elegant :-) | |
Sep 12, 2012 at 14:47 | comment | added | Joël | Oh, 4 votes to close !!! I don't see any reason why this interesting question should be closed. I think there are to many easy-closers around. | |
Sep 12, 2012 at 11:13 | comment | added | Lennart Meier | Nice, but the tikz-rendering of page 8 of jmilne.org/not/Mtikz.pdf seems to be even a bit more snaky (and was one of the reasons I switched to tikz). | |
Sep 12, 2012 at 10:10 | answer | added | Charles Matthews | timeline score: 2 | |
Sep 11, 2012 at 22:56 | answer | added | Benjamin Dickman | timeline score: 25 | |
Sep 11, 2012 at 20:56 | history | edited | agt |
edited tags
|
|
Sep 11, 2012 at 20:00 | comment | added | Alex Becker | Very nice, Andrew! | |
Sep 11, 2012 at 19:34 | comment | added | Will Jagy | Jill Clayburgh. youtube.com/watch?v=etbcKWEKnvg | |
Sep 11, 2012 at 19:04 | history | asked | Adam Epstein | CC BY-SA 3.0 |