Timeline for Independent evidence for the classification of topological 4-manifolds?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 1, 2022 at 17:23 | comment | added | Sam Nead | Would you accept as evidence the fact that even higher dimensional manifolds (for example the seven-sphere) have a more complicated smooth theory than topological? | |
Sep 17, 2021 at 16:11 | comment | added | Emilio Pisanty | @BrendanGuilfoyle Depending on your opinion of the cited book, consider changing the accepted answer to this one. If nothing else, it does appear to provide evidence that is independent to the 1982 paper, which is the core of the OP. | |
May 26, 2021 at 17:51 | comment | added | Andrej Bauer | Promotion committee: "What have you done in the last 5 years?" B.G.: "I've been writing a book about a paper published in 1982." Promotion committee: "How is that groundbreaking overachieving hyped research?" B.G.: "It is not, but I am preserving the knowledge of the elders." Promotion committee: "How told you that was a good idea?" B.G.: "A guy on the internet, and 24 people liked his suggestion." Promotion commitee: "We will call you, don't call us. Good bye." | |
Jan 27, 2020 at 15:14 | comment | added | Brendan Guilfoyle | I recently gave a talk discussing the motivation and ideas behind this question and two other linked mathoverflow questions: mathoverflow.net/questions/108631/fake-versus-exotic and mathoverflow.net/questions/252563/the-freedman-dichotomies . The talk was recorded and can be viewed at: youtube.com/watch?v=VZs1UG2Wtn8 | |
Oct 2, 2012 at 13:37 | comment | added | Steven Gubkin | Since you seem quite interested in making sure this knowledge is preserved, and in making sure the arguments are understandable, it seems that you are the perfect choice for the person who will write such a book! | |
Oct 1, 2012 at 21:15 | vote | accept | Brendan Guilfoyle | ||
Sep 11, 2012 at 8:40 | history | answered | Brendan Guilfoyle | CC BY-SA 3.0 |